Getting Down and Dirty!
Friday, November 30th, 2007The burgeoning organic movement should only be applauded and encouraged, but is there is a lurking danger of its philosophy being preoccupied chiefly with food? For every child who has devoured Jamie inspired school dinners, there are those, and their mothers, who view the menu of the day with grave suspicion because they don’t recognise some of the ingredients. Now a chip – we know where that comes from – a plastic bag in the frozen food section of the supermarket.
We’ve heard the tales about inner city kids who’ve never made the connection between the carton of semi-skimmed and a cow, and my contention is that unless we are encouraged to interact with Nature and observe its rhythms, patterns and creatures, we will never learn to deepen our relationship with the world or realise what it offers in terms of physical, emotional and spiritual nourishment.
We all sit transfixed as celebrities in the Australian outback are showered with maggots or devour witchety grubs, but it’s a sterile curiosity, from which none of our senses derive any significant benefit; I suspect that for many children their experience of nature is similarly vicarious and they never actually get their hands dirty.
I was fortunate in having a father who, having been thwarted in his aspirations to be an artist by the outbreak of the Second World War, channelled his creativity into the family home and garden. Admittedly this ‘urge’ ran the gamut of many fads and fancies, and embraced such diverse areas as baking wholemeal bread, (much to his children’s horror,) making Christmas decorations cut out in the same patterns as snowflake crystals and making his own bow and arrows, but, running alongside all these ephemeral joys was his lifelong passion for his garden.
One weekend in 1960, this passion initiated me into the mysteries of the carbon cycle. Father announced the impending arrival of manure for the garden, which was to be dumped outside the garden wall, and we should all have to help move it through the gate. The word ‘manure’ meant nothing to me, it had never featured in Schoolfriend or Girl, so I blithely awaited the delivery of what I presumed to be choice shrubs, and didn’t wonder at the need for wellies when my mother handed them out. When the steaming mass slid off the lorry, I was aghast. Not only was there a load of poop outside our house, but I was expected to interact with it! Worse still, as I shovelled and snivelled, the son of a neighbour, and the remote object of my affections, hove into sight on the side path and boggled openly at the sight of most of the family shovelling horse s—t for England. (The two youngest offspring had been spared, as they would probably have fallen into it.) I don’t remember now which was hotter, the manure or me, but I wouldn’t go outside the house for days. Persuaded by my father’s zeal, I did eventually experience a fascination for the process of decomposition, and now feel a deep satisfaction at the sight of charcoal coloured, crumbly earth.
Such was the beginning of my own closer relationship with the natural world. We had already been introduced to the more aesthetic aspects during regular Sunday walks, but now I wonder, when I see the children with mobiles, intent on their texting, if they ever look up to spot the first swallow, or catch a snowflake on their sleeve.
